news

Democracy Now! Wednesday, May 21, 2025

Democracy Now! 2025-05-20 Tuesday

• Headlines for May 20, 2025
• "The Suffering Is Beyond Description": Report from Gaza as U.N. Warns 14,000 Babies Could Soon Die
• Making Gaza Unlivable: Israel Intensifies Attacks as Netanyahu Vows to Seize All of Gaza
• From a Palestinian Refugee Camp to Columbia: Mohsen Mahdawi Graduates After Being Jailed by Trump

Download this show

Democracy Now! 2025-05-19 Monday

• Headlines for May 19, 2025
• "Absolutely Genocidal": Mouin Rabbani on "Gideon's Chariots," Israel's Latest Escalation of War on Gaza
• Project Esther: NYT Details Right-Wing Plan to "Rebrand All Critics of Israel" as Hamas Supporters
• On 100th Birthday of Malcolm X, Family Presses Trump to Release Gov't Files on Assassination

Download this show

Democracy Now! Friday, May 16, 2025

Democracy Now! 2025-05-15 Thursday

• Headlines for May 15, 2025
• "Trump's Fake Refugees": As U.S. Welcomes White South Africans, Trump Falsely Charges "Genocide"
• Israel's "Crime of Apartheid": New Report by U.S. Professors as Palestinians Mark Nakba Day
• "Surveillance Humanitarianism": As Gaza Starves, U.S.-Israeli Plan Would Further Weaponize Food

Download this show

Democracy Now! 2025-05-14 Wednesday

• Headlines for May 14, 2025
• U.S. & Saudis Sign $142B Arms Deal as Trump Meets with Syria's New Leader & Drops Syrian Sanctions
• While Israel Wanted to Bomb Iran, Trump Pushes Talks; But in Gaza, Israel's Mass Killings Continue
• Salvadoran Journalists Exposed Pres. Bukele's Ties to Gangs. Then They Had to Flee to Avoid Arrest

Download this show

In Part 2 of our interview with Palestinian journalist Abubaker Abed, the 22-year-old recounts leaving Gaza last month for Ireland while facing threats to his safety and suffering from malnutrition. He says he has found solidarity and comfort in Ireland, but says he is still dealing with the trauma of a year and a half of war. The sounds of planes and helicopters still trigger fear in him. “I’m trying to navigate this pain,” he says.

Democracy Now! Tuesday, May 13, 2025

Democracy Now! Monday, May 12, 2025

We speak with Oliver Laughland, The Guardian's U.S. southern bureau chief and investigations correspondent, about his reporting on the election in Elon Musk's new company town in Texas called Starbase; his report headlined “Trump officials increasingly recruit local police for immigration enforcement despite red flags,” and also his reporting on conditions in immigrant detention centers in Louisiana, Texas and Mississippi, which human rights advocates call “Detention Alley” and a “legal black hole.”

Democracy Now! 2025-05-09 Friday

• Headlines for May 09, 2025
• Leo XIV: First U.S.-Born Pope Criticized Trump/Vance on Deportations, Lack of Compassion for Immigrants
• Priest Sexual Abuse Survivors Demand Accountability from New Pope: "Open Up Those Archives"
• "We Are Not Living. We Are Enduring." Gaza Mother on Struggle for Food, Safety Under Israeli Blockade
• Tyre Nichols Case: Shock & Anger in Memphis as 3 Cops Acquitted on State Murder Charges

Download this show

Democracy Now! Thursday, May 8, 2025

Democracy Now! Wednesday, May 7, 2025

Democracy Now! 2025-05-06 Tuesday

• Headlines for May 06, 2025
• Trump's Newest Grift: Molly White on First Family's Cryptocurrency Empire & Gutting of Regulations
• Palestinian Poet Mosab Abu Toha on Winning a Pulitzer: I Can't Celebrate While Gaza Is Starving
• Israel's "Horrific Trifecta" of Starvation, Siege & Bombings Creates Maternal Health Disaster: Nurse

Download this show

Democracy Now! 2025-05-05 Monday

• Headlines for May 05, 2025
• "Chilling": Wisconsin Gov. Evers Pushes Back After Trump's Border Czar Threatens to Arrest Him
• "End Times Fascism": Naomi Klein on How Trump, Musk, Far Right "Don't Believe in the Future"

Download this show

Credit: Libertinus (licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.)

As part of the team convened by the solicitor Fahad Ansari of Riverway Law to apply for the deproscription of Hamas to the UK Home Secretary, I was tasked by the lawyers to gather expert reports that would form the evidentiary basis of our application.

We were fortunate that there was little hesitancy on the part of the experts once we approached them – having the former ad hoc judge to the ICJ, John Dugard, as well as Oxford professor Avi Shlaim among the many luminaries to lend their name in support of our submissions. While much has been written on Palestine, and indeed the expert reports covered ground that had been written before, it was important that our legal arguments were based on a body of evidence that supported the intended goals of the application – rather than merely a pastiche of previously published work.

For the last twenty-two years of my life, I have studied political violence in a range of contexts around the world, finding that the violence of non-state actors is nearly always the by-product of aggressive colonial, neo-colonial and repressive state forces. In many ways, Palestine stands as one of the most longstanding examples of how a people will continue to resist by any means necessary, when subject to constant state-led violations and oppression.

With that in mind, I made my own contributions to the bundle of expert reports. One report focused on the root causes of anti-colonial violence, by centring six case studies including:

1. Palestinian resistance to the Zionist state during the Second Intifada.
2. Chechen resistance to imperial Russia and later Soviet rule.
3. Moro resistance of the US occupation of the Philippines.
4. Uyghur resistance to Chinese settler colonisation of East Turkestan.
5. French resistance to Nazi and Vichy occupation during WWII.
6. Algerian resistance to French colonisation.

In all the above cases, it was the context of colonial violence that produced resistance movements, ones which were forced to engage in acts of violence that would seek to disrupt illusion of security maintained by colonial regimes.

Whether it was the Bride of Haifa, Hanadi Jaradat, carrying out a martyrdom operation at the restaurant Maxim during the Second Intifada, or the Algerian revolutionary Zohra Drif, planting a bomb in the Milk Bar Café during the Battle of Algiers, or even the juramentado attacks by Moro Muslims in the Philippines, during the US occupation in the early 1900s – the violence of resistance movements (organised or random) can always be traced and rooted in the extreme violence of occupying and colonial forces.

In the specific context of Palestinian dispossession, my other report seeks to understand how that dispossession presents itself as a grave moral wrong, one that will inevitably produce a violent response due to a natural law right to recover what has been stolen. The report seeks to enter into the taxonomy of violence the notion of dispossession resistance, a form of violence that flows directly from the loss of land and property. I show how nearly all ancient religious traditions contain severe sanctions against those who seek to deprive others of their land and property, centring the right of those who have lost what they once owned. The Palestinian struggle, is very much one of the theft of land, and the choice of a people to not give up on that land and maintain their moral authority over it.

While the dispossession has material effects on the Palestinian people, for faith-based movements, such as Hamas, there is also a spiritual dimension to dispossession resistance that must be acknowledged – for their relationship to the land and its recovery is derived from their relationship to God. In my expert report, I highlight the specific element of how dispossession resistance is presented in the Qur’an, outside of the schema of what is traditionally referred to as the conduct of hostilities within jihad.

This resistance is self-executing. It derives its moral legitimacy from the material reality of dispossession and the loss of what was once owned. Verses in the Qur’an from the chapters al-Baqarah, al-Hajj and al-Shurah, all strongly set out that not only is there a moral right and imperative to recover what was stolen through violent resistance, but that the upper limit of what is permitted in terms of that resistance, is any act of violence that the enemy has used against you. Such Qur’anic allowances exist outside of the traditional confines of jihad, which regulates military behaviour far more restrictively.

With the loss of land and property, my work is forced to contend with the role played by settlers and settlements since 1948. The story I share of Henrick and Genya Kowalski is instructive, as a Jewish couple who survived the crematoriums of the Nazis, only to arrive in Palestine to be offered the stolen home of a Palestinian family by the Jewish Agency. The Kowalskis were not able to full enter the house they had been given. Instead, they broke down in tears, recognising that they were being asked to do, what the Nazis had done to them. The Israeli anthropologist and scholar Jeff Halper, refers to this dispossession as summarised in the Hebraic word ‘nishul’:

“After the ethnic cleansing which accompanied the establishment of an expanded Israel, nishul took the form of removing Palestinians from vast tracts of the country and concentrating them in small, disconnected, and densely packed enclaves or cantons. To be sure, policies to induce emigration remained in place, targeting in particular the Palestinian middle classes, but the thrust of dispossession and de-Arabization shifted from expulsion to confinement.” (p.125)

This confinement is exemplified in the concentration camp that is the Gaza strip – a piece of land that is densely populated and cut off from the rest of the world. Its isolation from the Zionists on one side and reinforced by its other jailer, Egypt, on the other. Settlers and settlements exist as a reminder of not only what the Palestinians have had stolen from them, but explicitly as part of the machinery of Zionist violence – the ‘frontier settlements’ or nahal being what Eyal Weizman explains, the military units that establish those settlements. These settlements are in the very DNA of Zionism, as explained by David Ben Gurion, that they:

“…constitute a human wall against the dangers of invasion…Our territorial conquests and redemptions will not be assured if we do not succeed in erecting a great and closely linked chain of settlements of soldiers, on the borders, in the Negev, on the coast, in the Jerusalem corridor, around Safed, and in all other areas of strategic importance.”

If we understand that settlements are a form of dispossession violence themselves, then the Palestinians have every right, in the recovering of their land, to dismantle the settlements by any and all means available to them.

Their right to resistance is not limited by the existence settlements and settlers. On the contrary, to understand Palestinian resistance, is to acknowledge that until the entirety of the Zionist colonial entity and all its settlements are dismantled, the Palestinians will be entitled to exercise their natural law right to resist their dispossession and recover what was unlawfully stolen.

The post <b>Comment</b> | Dispossession resistance is a natural law right of the Palestinian people appeared first on Ceasefire Magazine.

Democracy Now! Friday, May 2, 2025

Democracy Now! Thursday, May 1, 2025

Democracy Now! 2025-04-30 Wednesday

• Headlines for April 30, 2025
• "Trump Is Trying to Break Us": Trump Threats to Annex Canada Help Liberal Party Win Critical Election
• DOGE Is Going Global: Elon Musk Is Inspiring Right-Wing Efforts Abroad to Gut Government Programs
• Viet Thanh Nguyen on 50 Years After Vietnam War, Trump's "Ugly American" Politics, El Salvador & More
• "To Save and to Destroy": Viet Thanh Nguyen on New Book Exploring Otherness, Refugees, Gaza & More

Download this show

Democracy Now! 2025-04-29 Tuesday

• Headlines for April 29, 2025
• "Taking Our Power Back": Immigrants & Workers Plan for May Day Protests as Trump Marks 100 Days
• "The Hollow Half": Palestinian-American Sarah Aziza on Gaza, Generational Trauma, Anorexia & Exile

Download this show